Greeny News

Too often, the sensitive issue of women's rights has been hijacked to mobilize opinion in favor or against a political movement

The question: If the religious law will slow

The Christian

peer Caroline Cox ran into fresh controversy and angered Muslims, especially the Islamic Council of Britain, by filing a bill that aims to meet concerns regarding arbitration of Sharia in Britain. The baroness (the same extended an invitation to Geert Wilders in 2010) said, "If we do nothing, we adopt." The "that" here is the violation alleged by the Shariah courts the legal parameters governing limited to civil cases only.

There are two separate issues that should not be confused. The first is a question of scale. We must not be touched in the mobilization of state mechanisms and hammering a nut. As Bill Philip Hollobone to ban women in burqas in his district, emotional concerns regarding the escalation of the face veil is not a problem where an appalling and discriminatory law was about to arrive to arrive. We must address the widespread problem "sharia creep" is, while recognizing that there are aspects of sharia that are inherently incompatible with the secular law of the United Kingdom. Sharia Courts in UK have a capacity of advice and guidance, primarily property and financial affairs, and resolutions are then applicable in the civil courts.

However, this is the second question, in some cases it may be an element of coercion, especially when it comes to women. The justification that the use of sharia courts is voluntary, is not convincing when it comes to women's rights, because there are many ways women can be pressured to maintain relationships in the sharia court . Having said this, and this may sound rude, I am increasingly suspicious of political incidents, and then extrapolate that into a phenomenon, especially when the flag of women's rights is corrugated. There were many times when the emotional power of concern for women was kidnapped to mobilize opinion in favor or against a political movement.

Baroness goes further by suggesting that, saying: "We can not sit here complacently in our banks red and green, while women have a system that is totally incompatible with the legal principles the founding of this country. "This is the full bill on the basis of legal concerns regarding the possibility of development of the" quasi-legal "Courts, of religion, which operate outside the law Ordinary UK, or primarily deals with sharia courts? Hence the confusion.

Find best price for : --Sharia----Caroline--