Tuesday, February 7, 2012

If you have a claim would be new to do, you must go through scientific publication and peer review before submitting it to the media

This week, Baroness Susan Greenfield, professor of pharmacology at Oxford announced that video games can cause dementia in children. It would be of scientific information. But that just opened a new wing to a school friend, not an academic conference. Then, a spokesman told a gaming site that's not what she means. Although he did not say what she means.

Two months ago, the same teacher internet use linked to increased diagnoses of autism (not first), then backward, when charities and Autism a psychology professor at Oxford for concern. Similar claims go way back. They seem interchangeable, but serious.

is with some concern that someone writes Professor Greenfield claims. When expressed concern, she said I was as epidemiologists who denied that smoking caused cancer. Other critics have derided as sexist. When Professor Dorothy Bishop was concerned, Professor Greenfield said: "It's really not for Dorothy to comment on how I run my race."

But I have a question, humble, why, in over five years to appear in media outreach to these serious concerns, Professor Greenfield was at the University of Oxford, not only published reports of academic

But the value of a scientific publication goes beyond the simple benefit, all relevant information that appears unambiguously in one place. It is also a way to communicate his ideas to his fellow scientists, and invite them to express an informed judgment.

In this regard, I do not speak of a peer review, the "least bad" of the system were set up to decide whether a work is the edition of the sentence, where other university in deciding whether the new and so on. This is often represented as a kind of monitoring system of truth, but in reality, horrible nonsense published, and that's good: an unstable material in a certain small value can be reported in the literature beware you professional buyers of academic science and academic readers of this literature, which are trained to critically evaluate a scientific case, you can make your own judgment.

It is this second stage of peer review - after publication - it is so important in science. If there are flaws in their case, the answers can be written in the form of letters or documents, including cereals. If there is no merit in his work, then new ideas and research will be activated. This is the actual process of science.

Find best price for : --Oxford----Susan--


Blog Archive