Saturday, November 19, 2011

A study of gang culture is unwavering in its portrayal of violence, but it lacks the social context

Throughout history, young men have fought battles without territorial sense, but in the last two decades, Britain has experienced an alarming increase in deadly violence of gangs. The stories of shootings and killings of teenagers, once considered remote in America, now come with depressing regularity of our cities.

In most cases the perpetrators are male and black (as are its victims), and almost without exception, are products of dysfunctional with the expectations of poor education and limited. Often, the most reliable work for the British youth urban economy of illicit drugs, with all its brutality inflation and social corrosion.

But once these facts were established bald, where you can get the story? There are arguments to be made on the reform of drug laws, better housing, levels of higher education and foster a greater sense of social inclusion. But what can be said of the gang members themselves, their values ??and codes of conduct, not just rehashing the clichés of gangsta rap?

Gavin Knight

hood rat

is unwavering account of the life and death in the states of the collapse of Britain. Enters the environment that most of us only watch the local news, and addresses the kind of people who fear being in a dark night, or even an afternoon light. The question is, in addition to the original vision?

The book contains many shocking stories, but little or no surprise. Anyone, for example, following the recent case of Gayle Santra, North of 15 years in London, who was hired to kill a stranger for 200 pounds, be aware of the phenomenon of teenage thugs. This is not a reason not to dive into the circumstances and motivations that lead teens to become murderers, but Chevalier seems less concerned about the depth of field.

Write in a style However, there is the suspicion that some of the tough conversations reported, and even the characters themselves are not entirely authentic. This is partly the result of the dialogue itself, the exhibition, sometimes conveniently not too heavy, but is also inherent in a manner that might call semi-fiction, non fiction.

Knight has spent long periods of time "embedded" with the police anti-gang units in Manchester, London and Glasgow. My project came with the words "everything you read here is true" stamped on the back, while a note to the reader at the front, said: "Many names, nicknames, times, dates and identify personal characteristics have changed and some composite characters created from several people. "So all is not true. It's not just little things. Given the scarcity of conventional portraits that can help us to work with the fate of the young knight records, things like that they know their thoughts are real and accurate and, above all, belongs to a real person instead of some compounds of the building. As it is, because every stabbings, shootings and gang attacks is told in detail in the rooms, repetitive, merging in a pump up the image of senseless violence is mostly family.

Maybe that's the point. Maybe all the gang members are somewhat interchangeable: all trapped by the narrow horizons. If so, that does not require 300 pages of printed razor and head for this question. And I do not really intend to Knight.
major drawback of the book is that there seems to be confusion of the object. They call it the dilemma of Ross Kemp, getting the balance between violence, including enough to attract the real audience of crime and the social enough to be considered worthy of being taken seriously.

Find best price for : --Glasgow----Karyn----Knight--


Blog Archive