Friday, September 21, 2012

Research Group

pleaded with the demonstrators to cancel his threat to destroy evidence - and even offered to finance public debate

The term "Frankenstein" entered English tabloid at the beginning of last century, when demonstrators, supported by the green movement, destroying genetically modified crops wearing suits and white masks as a ploy emotional public relations.

Much of the early opposition to GM crops is intended to multinational corporations, especially Monsanto, whose heavy approach to public concerns fueled resentment and mistrust. When asked in 1998 about the safety of genetically modified foods, many of Monsanto in the United States, said: "Our interest is in selling as much of it as possible Ensuring security is a matter of the FDA. ".

Monsanto dismissive response was awkward, even for large companies. The public sector scientists at Rothamsted Research, who cultivate a culture of experimentation with genetically modified wheat without commercial support, are a different breed. When the anti-GM group, take the meal back, declared a day of mass action to destroy their facilities, protesters were invited to discuss the work. They recorded a video in which all the scientists in turn appealed directly to militants not to go ahead with his threat. He asked them to spend at least a related experiment, which began in the fields around Rothamsted in 1843.

genetically modified wheat at Rothamsted is modified to produce a scent undetectable to the human nose, parasites wheat principal, such as aphids and blackfly aphids release in case of an attack against the predators. The chemical acts as an alarm application which scarper aphid another. Some 400 species of plants, including mint, to the same chemical, but if it serves to protect against parasites is not quite clear.

The trial of GM wheat hopes to find answers to many questions. A culture that produces an alarm pheromone of aphids constantly bursting repel pests? Insects or are indifferent if the substance is not released in spurts, as is the case in nature? Do pheromones to attract predators of aphids on crops as a suspect? Is that wheat is grown with less pesticides? What are the spillover effects on other organisms? The feasibility and acceptability of cultures is based on the answers to these questions. Protesters opposing the judgment by a multitude of reasons. They argue that cultures are not proven safe for people or the environment. They fear that this will not reduce the use of pesticides, GM strain eventually be marketed by the industry, which could lead to contamination.

Find best price for : --Rothamsted--


Blog Archive