saving forests offers a new way to fight against hunger and malnutrition, the promotion of development and the fight against climate change
Although forests once provided livelihoods for local people for generations to clear the forest was also good for business, the overall immediate food security for the world. In short, the forests were worth more dead than alive.
As the population increases, emerging economies and industrialized countries are in search of three major forest regions of the world - the three basins of the Congo, the Amazon and Southeast Asia - resources for your growing needs. The economic imperative to acquire more land and clean each day increases the demand for food and raw materials increases. More than half of the loss of forests worldwide took place in the three basins. But global food production must untapped permanent forest trees.
and forests are not on the food as they protect local communities against catastrophic flooding and erosion in the rainy season .. The forests of the three basins act as large carbon capture and storage units, the development of approximately 10% of annual greenhouse gas emissions each year. They are the main defense of the planet against climate change - a fact that is often lost in the midst of a debate on climate change that focuses almost exclusively on fossil fuels. The destruction of forests for our unstable and unpredictable climate, with increasing desert areas and extreme weather conditions. Instead, over the use of forests in the three basins has enormous potential to limit future damage from climate change.
Obviously, we need to stop affect forests in the world, but it is not as easy as it sounds. In the same way that fossil fuels are deeply rooted in the way countries develop, so it is a model of centuries of land use in which the forest land is considered a resource to be exploited. Stop the destruction of the forest during the night is not possible or desirable, as it would make the price and availability of food and other rockets.
However, it is possible to find a balance. Brazil already shows what is possible. By reducing deforestation by two thirds since 2004, Brazil has avoided 1 billion tons of CO2 emissions - not many people know that it is a greater reduction in emissions than any other country. This has not been achieved at the expense of economic growth: at the same time, Brazil has lifted 10 million people out of poverty and continues to supply the world with food such as meat and soy, and other resources. My own country, Guyana, holds 99.5% of our forests, while significant investments in new economic sectors that pressure on forests in the long term. Many other countries with forests in the three basins are ready to act. Proposals have been made national ambition. Many, including Vietnam, Gabon and Republic of Congo have detailed plans in which, supported by a high-level political commitment.
If countries are ready to act: the way we deliver development, reduce poverty and advance the number of people more, while protecting the climate? The challenge is to invest in a new model of land use which addresses the causes of the disappearance of forests, develop alternative sources of income and employment for forest communities, and addresses the growing demand for food safety This means untie global poverty reduction and economic growth of deforestation, the same way the world is beginning to decouple economic growth from the use of fossil fuels. But it is difficult and expensive - and all the benefits they have to participate in the payment of valuable services that forests provide. We need to make forests worth more alive than dead.
- An agreement is not only logical for food and the planet has a new partnership for development. The West invests in the forests of favorable economic growth and get something in return - less prone to damage due to weather, cheaper insurance premiums, and less need to invest in defenses against floods and other weather. Fair compensation for the services provided by forests supports a country's own efforts to forestry development and the fight against poverty, creating a catalyst for private investment, entrepreneurship and sustainable employment. In exchange, develop new markets for food and resources, trade increases and offer climate change objectives. This will not only provide the momentum and confidence of these commitments, but will divert private capital in deforestation sustainable forest maintenance.
- international community must commit to meet existing commitments, including commitments to ramp up support for three countries basins develop new environmentally friendly economies in the forest as part of global efforts to combat against hunger, nutrition and climate change. Only by delivering some of the funds that were promised - we estimate that 9% - rich countries could implement a change that benefits us all
Blog Archive
-
▼
2013
(105)
-
▼
April
(20)
- Insecticide firms in secret bid to stop ban that c...
- Bathrobes, designer bags and crystal lamps … Sarko...
- Amazon v the Amazon: internet retailer in domain n...
- Serbia's unabated quest for coal causes tremors am...
- Six ideas to save the EU
- Why action on forests now is essential to all our ...
- Events mark 70 years since Warsaw ghetto uprising
- Margaret Thatcher, science advice and climate chan...
- Care home residents with dementia sent to A&E alone
- How can I spot signs of antisocial behaviour in my...
- New to nature No 101: Lanonia centralis
- Busts of Il Duce and Di Canio T-shirts – welcome t...
- Judge strikes down restrictions on over the counte...
- US Soccer Federation celebrates 100th anniversary ...
- After Leveson: newspapers need not fear statutory ...
- 25 years after Chico Mendes, killings in the Amazo...
- Camp Nama: British personnel reveal horrors of sec...
- Novartis denied cancer drug patent in landmark Ind...
- Novartis cancer drug patent bid rejected by Indian...
- Earth-cooling schemes need global sign-off, resear...
-
▼
April
(20)
0 comments:
Post a Comment