The first "independent" review of the safety failures during Japan's nuclear disaster reveals some chillingly obvious "lessons" to be learned
doubts about nuclear power? Here 's the five questions you must answer the you to decide,
The first "independent" review of the Fukushima nuclear disaster was released today and there is no reassuring reading.
This, in other words, says that the unexpected will occur and tacitly admits it can't be planned for.
For these deadlines are unforeseen events is a certainty, with enormously expensive consequences. The earthquake and tsunami that hit Japan were extreme, and try the IAEA report, argues that new nuclear security rules should learn lessons from the failure to manage the system in Fukushima.
But the real lesson is that it is impossible to cover all eventualities. This means that nuclear energy is not safe, or, given the huge rehabilitation costs, cheap. Unfortunately, I think it is an illusory answer to the problem of rising greenhouse gas emissions and climate change.
- Nuclear power
- Nuclear waste
- Energy
- Japan disaster
Blog Archive
-
▼
2011
(633)
-
▼
June
(15)
- Conservationists discover more than 1,000 species ...
- David Cameron must speak out on climate change, sa...
- What to see: Lyn Gardner's theatre tips
- Why the insurance industry gets climate change | J...
- Cribsheet 24.06.11
- Britain's moths enjoy their moment in the spotlight
- Live chat from 1pm: HE going green?
- Al Gore's rallying call: 'Climate crisis is a stru...
- Roads and rice: How innovation and infrastructure ...
- Fukushima report shows nuclear power can never be ...
- Birdbooker Report 175
- The 1847 lecture that predicted human-induced clim...
- IPCC asks scientists to assess geo-engineering cli...
- Chris Huhne attacks Tory 'zealots' over proposed s...
- England v Sri Lanka – day four live! | Ian McCourt...
-
▼
June
(15)
0 comments:
Post a Comment