Thursday, October 4, 2012

GM foods: science and society | Editorial

10:23 AM | Posted by Free Game Zone | | Edit Post

It is a fertile ground for food production more efficient, but scientists do not abuse your hand

protesters gathered at the weekend

Rothamsted Research, North London, which threatens to destroy a field of genetically modified wheat. In the case of protest, called Take Back the flour was relatively underserved, the police were in force and all ended peacefully. It is a far cry from 1990, when the Friends of the Earth have been launching raids on crops experimental anti-radiation suits. Activists last weekend wearing T-shirts and looked like a picnic. More importantly, when London Green Jenny Jones said he would join them, Twitterstorm criticized. It begins to feel as if scientists are winning the debate on GMOs.

course, the nature of the debate has changed. The context is different, more nuanced and scientific arguments much, much smarter. The trial of GM wheat could not be more attractive: the harvest had been modified to release an alarm pheromone, a scent undetectable to humans that prevent aphids, which reduces the need for pesticides. No Frankenstein here. Then, Rothamsted - although research supported by industry - is at the other end of the spectrum, such as Monsanto global agrochemical outcasts. It is an independent charity and Wheat project has been funded with public money.
  • In another smart move, it was re-released in March by the scientists, who called the demonstrators to participate in arguments (what they do, to some extent, on the site The Guardian). Transgenic crops were common in many parts of the world for over a decade. More generally, the rise of religious fundamentalism has led the state of the science. And last year, food prices soared, causing a faint echo of the crisis in Europe to recurrent food security in the southern hemisphere.
It is a fertile soil for food production more efficient. But scientists do not overdo his hand. Natural science is the answer. But there is a simple choice between GM and underweight. The world is made to produce more food in the most difficult circumstances, but also to other crises:. Intermediate control for farmers, the damage caused by speculation and extravagance simple

And although there is little evidence that the consequences of the prophecies correspond GM (in particular, the potential risks to the health of consumers), which is not very far from saying that each proposal will be a good or unintended consequences, such as viral mutation or the appearance of a parasite were not considered, can be avoided. Science has some answers to a hungry world and I think GM could be one of them. This is what happens.



Find best price for : --Guardian----Rothamsted--

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Blog Archive

Blogger Template created with Artisteer.